Dodge neon srt 4 problems




Dodge neon srt 4 problems

Article Navigation:
  • Photo
  • Dodge Neon SRT-4 Questions - pro's/cons? - CarGurus
  • Video
  • RELATED PAGES
  • Can everyone chime in with the most common SRT-4 problems? NOT including the SRT-4 owners, sorry. Oh that's in stock form of.

    Props to The Dodge Boys for their steadfast refusal to give up on the Neon. Its original incarnation was a googly-eyed flexible flyer, with sharp.

    View all 85 consumer vehicle reviews for the Used Dodge Neon SRT-4 on Edmunds, or submit your own review of the Neon. I fixed the transmission shift problem with a complete Hurst Shifter. I love this car. A true soon to be.

    Dodge neon srt 4 problems

    Dodge neon srt 4 problems

    He also completed 37 passes in a row in a game. What is your next argument? John answered 9 years ago. Obviously from reading other run-ins people have had with you on here, there is a definite bias, and I can probably guess why.

    Dodge neon srt 4 problems

    Dodge neon srt 4 problems

    Dodge neon srt 4 problems

    Dodge neon srt 4 problems

    Dodge neon srt 4 problems

    In the first paragraph in the performance section it sites that the SRT-4 is under-rated from the factory and claims that the official power outputs where deliberately falsified by Dodge. However no where does it site any proof for this and the reference for the claim of wheel HP is just as vague.

    IMO this section is mere hearsay rather than fact and shouldn't be included. I do not dispute the power output of the car, just this example and reference. The reference article [2] does not explain what type of dyno used Eddy current or inertia nor any of the correction factors or test conditions. In addition there is no explanation on how flywheel power is determined from wheel derived HP.

    Dodge neon srt 4 problems

    Either more explanation is required to explain the details of the claim or a reference to cite an example where the engine has been placed on an engine dyno and tested to FULL SAE Net standards and has produced notably higher results. While rated at hp, the actual figure is closer to hp. One drive in a Neon-based SRT-4, and you'll know the advertised horsepower is an underrated sham. Honestly, let's put this nonsense to rest. The Neon SRT-4 pushes whp, with the actual flywheel hp somewhere in the area of Anyone who argues otherwise is merely sour grapes and a sore loser of sorts.

    These 'sources' are not verifiable at all. They are simply spreading the same rumor around in circles. Review units could easily be overboosted by psi, and differences between individual cars and their rated power by the manufacturer should not be the basis of information for the entire model in Wikipedia. These same crazy, fanboy rumors used to circulate about the STi when it first came out. Motortrend simply stated that the SRT4 'seemed' faster than hp, without any evidence.

    Dodge neon srt 4 problems

    Modernperformance is not a valid source, and doesn't provide any evidence. Allpar is clearly a Dodge-biased site. Turbomagazine is clearly not an authoritative source. Kelly Blue Book has been around almost as long as the automotive industry has. It is a trusted source. So is edmunds, and automotive. They quote the factory numbers - so should we. Differences between individual cars - if they even exist - are the exception, not the rule, and should not be taken into account. Please don't make personal attacks.

    From going through the logs of this article, I've noticed that you are one of the people who tried to claim that the Neon SRT4 was not based on a Neon. You also claim that you own the car.

    We had to correct fanboys that did this to the STi article, we had to correct fanboys that did this to the Camaro Z28 article, and now we have to correct this article. Dodge did not issue a correction to their specification. The car is officially to the flywheel as far as dealers, manufacturers, and authorities on cars are concerned.

    Dodge neon srt 4 problems

    Just because you have done some original research, doesn't mean you can change reality. I'm sorry, but threatening me in all caps won't stop my quest to make Wikipedia more truthful. I have never claimed the SRT-4 is not a Neon, only that the information had already been indicated:. I didn't claim that it should be called a Neon. You changed my argument, and then argued some random point that has nothing to do with this discussion.

    We have provided a whole list of evidence that shows that the flywheel horsepower is signficantly higher, using documented evidence. Your evidence is unconvincing, and doesn't follow Wikipedia guidelines as it is a fringe source. RS for more information. Official numbers are always better than numbers derived from self-serving sources, especially when other, industry-standard sources have corroborated this claim.



    • Подписаться по RSSRSS
    • Поделиться VkontakteVkontakte
    • Поделиться на FacebookFacebook
    • Твитнуть!Twitter

    Leave a Reply

    Return to Top ▲TOP ▲